All about me.

My photo
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Hi All! I am a born and raised Canadian that is currently living a European life. I decided the best way to appreciate Canada was to escape it for awhile and see what other countries have to offer. I spent a year in Dublin and currently reside in Amsterdam. The plan is to live in Amsterdam for the next few years while I complete my Master's in Instructional Design and Technology. I look forward to blogging about my experiences as I begin to get closer to developing my Instructional Design skills and potentially gaining experience in this field. My goal is to complete my program and begin to develop and deliver training programs.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

The Art of Communicating Effectively

As we have probably all realized our interpretations of various messages changes based on the median being used to deliver that message. Often times in email messages tone can be misinterpreted or misread which then makes the reader think the writer is being rude, demanding or possibly unprofessional. Also, depending on the author’s or readers backgrounds, education, technical experience and culture can also dictate how a message is expressed or interpreted. In my previous role I was supporting online Master’s students from all over the world. Often times I would have to be extremely clear and conscious of the language I was using in my email correspondences with them. I could not assume all of them understood something I was implying or assume they understood what I required of them. It was always best to lay out clearly any points or items that I wanted them to understand.

In watching the Media “The Art of Effective Communication”, I was surprised that my opinion of the message did not change all that much. Going in the order of reviewing the email to voicemail to a face-to-face message the tone, content and my understanding of the message remained the same. I found the author of these messages to have excellent tone in their email and they did not come across as confrontation and remained professional in their email communication. The communication that best conveyed their true meaning was the face to face message as you could easily see her tone, expressions, body language and need for the report to be delivered.

Depending on where your project team is I think it is best to have face-to-face meetings. This allows everyone to express themselves fully and for the complete team to witness what is being said. This way if there is something that everyone does not quite understand they can get clarification on the spot as oppose to waiting on an email response or even following through the situation with their own interpretation and possibly getting it wrong.

3 comments:

  1. Hi Liz,

    You listed in your discussion many components that can influence a message. Additionally, Stolovitch (2010), asserted that your spirit and attitude is more important that the words you use and that tonality, body language, timing and personality of the recipient are all part of communication.

    As I watched the video of each message being displayed, I also agree, that the phone conversation and the face to face conversation seem to convey the true meaning and intent of the message. However, the face to face had the most effective meaning because you were able see the body language being used in the conversation.

    Reference

    Stolovitch, H. D. (2010). Communicating with stakeholders: [Motion Picture]

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous6:08:00 AM

    Hi Liz,
    I felt the face-to-face message was the least effective because the speaker looked wishy-washy or indifferent to the urgency of the need for the report. Maybe she was being respectful or polite, but I thought her non-verbal actions detracted from the message.

    What did you see in her tone and body language that expressed the need for the report to be delivered?

    Thanks,
    Joe

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Liz,

    I felt that the tone of the email could have easily been misunderstood. "A recent study reports that the tone in email is misinterpreted 50 percent of the time. Furthermore, 90 percent of people think they've correctly intepreted the tone of emails they receive, making for a dangerous gap in communication". (Yang, 2006) Email can make for a very odd work environment. I have two supervisor that work together in different buildings that don't talk to each other when they are together in person becasue the relations has been strained by email.

    Thanks,
    Rob

    ReplyDelete